|
Finding
Prospects – Mailing, Emailing or Calling – Which Works
BEST?
There
are many theories about what is the best way to find prospects.
Certainly large advertising campaigns and trade shows take up a
lot of the marketing budget. But when you need to reach specifically-targeted individuals on a large-scale basis,
it really boils down to three options: Mailing them, emailing them,
or calling them directly.
The
context of our discussion will be from the frame of reference of
a company that targets the corporate training or talent management decision maker. Mentor
Tech Group (MTG) works exclusively with clients that market to the
corporate training & human resources world—so we have gained an appreciation
for the struggle that Sales & Marketing go through in trying
to reach this audience.
We
understand the challenges you face.
Mailing:
The
most prevalent method of proactively getting prospects
is direct mail: Sending hardcopy material to those that best
fit the description of the decision maker in their respective
business.
This
is also the path of least resistance—and
the one most likely to be chosen by corporate marketing
departments. Here's why:
- It's
easy to do (but not necessarily cheap!)
- It
does not involve REJECTION
- "This
is the way it has always been done"
These
are not necessarily the right reasons to do it. Consider the following:
-
Since everyone is doing this, there is tremendous "clutter"
in our inbox at work (and home!). Because of this clutter,
your creative marketing piece is competing with many other marketing
pieces, so they are less likely to pay attention to yours—more
so than ever before!
- The
lists used to reach corporate training or talent management decision makers are of
questionable quality. We estimate that up to 50% (sometimes
more!) of your direct mail pieces never reach their
intended recipients.
- At
$2 per piece plus mailing plus list rental, this is not
really an inexpensive proposition. And considering that, in many
cases, less than half of the contacts actually receive your mail—this
is throwing money away.
Conclusion
Direct mail is the least effective—but most commonly
used—way to proactively find prospects.
Emailing:
More
and more companies are beginning to use HTML emailers because many
find it delivers an improved response rate over direct
mail. Why? Two reasons:
- Less
effort is required to respond to an email versus direct mail
- The
prospect can more easily link to your web site to evaluate your
value proposition and how it may benefit them
Beyond
the cost of creating the HTML marketing piece, the cost to send
it is minimal. This can be done in-house—or by an outside
company that can deliver value-added email blasting (like MTG! More info).
Regardless of how it's done, to get the best results, you
should:
- Capture
the email address, phone number, title, and company information
of those who respond (link to your web site) to your email.
- Use
that lead information as a follow up tool—now your sales
team can follow up with those that not only requested more information,
but also with those that merely linked to your site!
That
leaves the cost of securing WHOM to email. As mentioned in the previous
section, securing good lists has been a challenge in the market you target. Responding to this challenge, MTG has created a
precisely targeted list for companies marketing to
corporate training and talent management/HR executives—one by one—by conducting
telephone interviews. We now have the email addresses for over 20,000 executives - focused on training, talent management or human resources. More
Info
Lastly,
emailing is also in-trend: It can enable you to create a "Permission
Marketing" program, as opposed to using "Interruption
Marketing"—like hardcopy mailers. We will explore this
in more detail in a future newsletter. In the meantime, we highly
recommend reading: "Permission Marketing" written by Seth
Godin, former Vice-President of Direct Marketing for Yahoo!
Conclusion
Emailing using a properly conceived permission marketing program
will enable your team to reap ever-increasing response rates from
your marketing efforts.
Calling:
This
is the most proactive method of discovering WHO your prospects
are: Call them and ask them! It also has the following paradoxical
challenges:
- Those
most well equipped to perform cold calling are usually least
likely to have time to do it or even want
to do it—so it is either not done at all—or done
intermittently (thus, poorly)
- Those
most likely to be chartered to do cold calling are usually
second tier callers—and are usually not as good at it
Plus,
doing this involves REJECTION—and it is human nature to avoid
rejection.
But,
since the payoff is high, one would think that
a higher priority would be placed on cold calling. Being so
potentially effective, why is cold calling usually the last method
of proactive prospecting performed?
The
reason is that cold calling is the path of most
resistance—because it has the most challenges.
But it also has the potential to deliver an excellent return on investment
(ROI). Most companies considering it are perpetually in one stage
or another of trying to figure out how to do it right—doing
it in-house or outsourcing it.
Both
methods have challenges:
Doing
it in-house.
- Lack
of focus—inside sales/telemarketers end up getting "pulled"
into doing other, unrelated tasks, making them far
less productive
- Turnover
problems—it's a hard job
- Competency
problems—it's not easy to find someone good at doing it
that wants to do it!
- Headcount—do
you have the "bodies" to do it?
- Your team works with a poor list! (Get a precisely targeted list!)
Outsourcing
it.
- Does
the company have a thorough knowledge of your industry?
-
Do they "speak the language" of corporate training/HR decision
makers?
-
Do they have an understanding of "solution sales?"
-
Do they understand the level of detail to obtain about prospects?
Regardless
of how it's done, the ROI achieved is directly correlated
with the abilities of those making the calls. To achieve
excellent results in your company, it should
be required that cold callers:
- Be
experienced in your industry enough to engage
a C-level executive about the benefits of your solution or service
-
Be 100% focused on making calls and finding prospects—otherwise
performance will suffer
-
Have the ability to "schmooze" with people—a lively
and friendly personality that can think quickly on their feet
-
Be able to handle the rejection and the mundane nature of the
job
Conclusion
Cold calling can be a very effective way to get prospects - but you HAVE to have the right people doing it! Many companies are wasting their money because the wrong people are making the calls. If you're going to do it, you have to do it right.
MOST EFFECTIVE:
A combination of emailing and cold calling will yield the best results and the best ROI. Specifically, email programs designed to capture "click-through" information by offering some enticing information or some value-add to get your prospects to respond. (We prefer a curriculum-based newsletter) Then, your cold-callers can become "warm-callers" by calling the "click-throughs." Cold-callers will be working with a much more manageable calling list; and these calls will be "warm calls." This is a better situation all-around and much more bang for the buck than doing either email or cold calling by itself. We'll address this fantastic marketing methodology in a separate newsletter.
PS
Mentor Tech Group maintains a fully drilled-down, built-from-scratch list of corporate training and e-learning decision makers (plus talent management & human resources) that can supercharge your mailing, emailing and cold calling efforts! This market intelligence is precisely targeted and highly accurate because every piece of information on our database got there as a result of a personal conversation with one of our Prospect Development Specialists!
Mentor Tech Group, Inc.
www.mentortechgroup.com
Telephone (651) 457-8600
"Empowering Enterprises Today - To Build the Sales Pipelines
of Tomorrow"
|